Skip to content
18+For adults 18+ only. Sports betting involves risk.

WTA Ningbo Prediction: Sara Bejlek Takes On Alycia Parks

WTA. Ningbo· Round of 32 Finished
Sara BejlekSara Bejlek
2:1
(4:6, 6:3, 6:3)
Full time
Alycia ParksAlycia Parks
11.17
25
Our prediction
Handicap 1 (-5) 1.75
Stake 100 $, potential win 75 $ odds at kick-off 1.76
lost
−100 $

Match result

Sara Bejlek 2:1 Alycia Parks (4:6, 6:3, 6:3)

At WTA Ningbo, Sara Bejlek defeated Alycia Parks with a 2:1 score across three sets: 4:6, 6:3, and 6:3. Our betting prediction for this matchup was Asian handicap 1 (-5), and the bet lost following the final result.

Our prediction: Handicap 1 (-5) at 1.75 — the bet lost.

Sara Bejlek and Alycia Parks meet in the round of 32 at Ningbo Taishi Tennis Club. The match is scheduled for October 20 at 01:00 America/New_York time. Both arrive after consecutive defeats, but their recent ability to win sets differs sharply.

Sara Bejlek
Sara BejlekLast 5: 2 W, 0 D, 3 L

Bejlek: recent wins interrupted by straight-set losses

Form and competitive strengths

Bejlek has won 2 of her last 5 matches. Her latest three appearances brought a straight-set victory over Maddison Inglis followed by straight-set defeats against Naomi Osaka and Jasmine Paolini. That pattern concerns match length, rather than proving that individual sets were one-sided.

  • Both victories were completed without conceding a set.
  • She has lost her last 2 matches without winning a set, limiting the case for strong current form.

Serve, return and preparation

Bejlek last played on October 12. The available information does not establish a preparation advantage. Her recent results cannot be attributed to a particular serve or return strength.

Recent matches
  • Jasmine Paoliniaway0:2
  • Naomi Osakahome0:2
  • Maddison Inglishome2:0
  • Cristina Bucsaaway0:2
  • Alycia Parksaway2:0
Alycia Parks
Alycia ParksLast 5: 0 W, 0 D, 5 L

Parks: a run without a set won

Results and pressure points

Parks has lost all 5 of her latest listed matches, with a combined set record of 0–9. Three defeats came against Leylah Annie Fernandez, Lin Zhu and Aoi Ito before two qualifying appearances in Ningbo. The immediate weakness is clear: she has not converted any of these appearances into a won set. There are no service-game or break-point figures to identify where those matches turned.

Local court time and recovery

Her latest defeat was against Yulia Putintseva on October 18, by 2–6, 2–6: Parks won 4 of the 16 games played. She also appeared against Jeline Vandromme the previous day, with that result listed as 0–1 in sets; the score alone does not establish why it ended there. Two recent appearances at the venue provide local court time, but leave a shorter recovery interval. Her route into this listed main-draw fixture after qualifying defeats is not specified.

Recent matches
  • Yulia Putintsevahome0:2
  • Jeline Vandrommehome0:1
  • Aoi Itoaway0:2
  • Lin Zhuhome0:2
  • Leylah Annie Fernandezhome0:2

Head-to-head: Bejlek has won all three

Bejlek leads the official meetings from the past five years by 3–0, with a 6–1 aggregate set record. Their first meeting, in Australian Open qualifying in 2023, went to three sets; the Prague meeting in 2025 ended in two. The latest encounter, in Guadalajara last month, finished 6–4, 6–3. Its 19 games offer a direct matchup reference, but game scores are unavailable for the earlier meetings, preventing a meaningful average total.

Sara Bejlek wins 3draws 0Alycia Parks wins 0
  • 15.09.2026Alycia Parks0:2Sara BejlekWTA. Guadalajara
  • 23.07.2025Sara Bejlek2:0Alycia ParksWTA. Prague
  • 11.01.2023Alycia Parks1:2Sara BejlekAustralian Open. Women. Qualification

Team news and expert comment

No confirmed injury updates, suspensions, coaching changes or expert comments are supplied for either player.

Our pick: Bejlek to clear the game handicap

Our selection is Handicap 1 (-5) 1.75. Bejlek’s edge in this matchup supports backing a margin rather than just a win, although the latest meeting shows how fine that distinction is: her 6-4, 6-3 victory in Guadalajara would have returned the stake on this line, not won it. She needs a wider gap in Ningbo.

Parks’ 2-6, 2-6 qualifying defeat to Yulia Putintseva is the strongest recent argument for that extra separation. A repeat of that eight-game deficit would comfortably clear the handicap. Bejlek’s own two-match losing run prevents treating this as a low-risk selection, but Parks arrives without a set won across her last five appearances. The preferred scenario is Bejlek building a lead without allowing either set to become extended. Predicted score: 6-3, 6-2. There is no confirmed injury news to add.

Final betting verdict

Handicap 1 (-5) 1.75 requires Bejlek to turn her matchup advantage into a decisive game margin. The main risk is another narrow straight-set win; the selection needs her to improve on September’s winning margin.

Team form

Sara Bejlek
Sara BejlekLast 5: 2 W, 0 D, 3 L
  • Jasmine Paoliniaway0:2
  • Naomi Osakahome0:2
  • Maddison Inglishome2:0
  • Cristina Bucsaaway0:2
  • Alycia Parksaway2:0
Alycia Parks
Alycia ParksLast 5: 0 W, 0 D, 5 L
  • Yulia Putintsevahome0:2
  • Jeline Vandrommehome0:1
  • Aoi Itoaway0:2
  • Lin Zhuhome0:2
  • Leylah Annie Fernandezhome0:2

Head-to-head

Sara Bejlek wins 3draws 0Alycia Parks wins 0
  • 15.09.2026Alycia Parks0:2Sara BejlekWTA. Guadalajara
  • 23.07.2025Sara Bejlek2:0Alycia ParksWTA. Prague
  • 11.01.2023Alycia Parks1:2Sara BejlekAustralian Open. Women. Qualification

About the match

  • 20 October · 01:00 New York
  • Venue: Ningbo Taishi Tennis Club (Ningbo)

Odds

Match result
W11.17
W25
Handicaps
Handicap 1 (-6)2.35
Handicap 1 (-5.5)1.9
Handicap 1 (-5)1.76
Handicap 2 (5)1.9
Handicap 2 (5.5)1.9
Handicap 2 (6)1.5
Totals
Total Over (18.5)1.58
Total Over (19.5)1.96
Total Over (20.5)2.11
Total Under (18.5)2.18
Total Under (19.5)1.85
Total Under (20.5)1.61

odds before kick-off

Game totals: balanced pricing, upward pressure

The supplied market concerns Over/Under 19.5 games, with each side assigned a margin-free probability of 50%. Over has shortened during the past 24 hours while Under has drifted, indicating movement toward a longer match without an outright probability advantage in the quoted assessment. No match-winner market is supplied, so a bookmaker favourite cannot be identified.

The total hinges on set competitiveness as well as the number of sets: two close sets can exceed the line, while a straight-set match with repeated breaks can stay below it. The recent result summaries contain too few game scores to calculate either player's Over/Under frequency reliably.

Our prediction

Market
Handicap 1 (-5)
Odds
1.75
Confidence
Our estimate
52%
Market estimate
52%
Stake amount
100 $ · 1.75
Potential win
75 $
Odds at kick-off
1.76
Status
lost
Profit
−100 $